l ala γ d glu mdap tri dap (InvivoGen)
Structured Review

L Ala γ D Glu Mdap Tri Dap, supplied by InvivoGen, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 134 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/l ala γ d glu mdap tri dap/product/InvivoGen
Average 94 stars, based on 134 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Chlamydia trachomatis restricts signaling through NOD2 until late in the pathogen’s developmental cycle"
Article Title: Chlamydia trachomatis restricts signaling through NOD2 until late in the pathogen’s developmental cycle
Journal: Infection and Immunity
doi: 10.1128/iai.00472-25
Figure Legend Snippet: Pre-treatment with NOD1- and NOD2-stimulatory ligands prior to infection with C. trachomatis significantly impacts inclusion size in NLR-expressing cell lines. HepG2, C-33A, and SiHa cells were pre-treated with Tri-DAP, MDP, or both, prior to infection with C. trachomatis L2 strain Bu/434. At 24 hpi, cells were fixed, inclusions were labeled, counted, and measured. zStacks of MOMP-labeled objects were obtained from a Zeiss 700 confocal microscope, and approximate volume measurements were calculated for all inclusions present within 10 imaging fields. Data presented represent all MOMP-labeled objects counted resulting in inclusions > 20 µm 3 ; 3 µm across with red lines indicating the mean of each group within a data set. Significance was assessed via one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. ****; P < 0.0001, ***; P < 0.001, **; P < 0.01, ns; not significant.
Techniques Used: Infection, Expressing, Labeling, Microscopy, Imaging
Figure Legend Snippet: Pre-treatment with NOD2-stimulatory ligands delays the development of C. trachomatis in NLR-expressing cell lines. HepG2 ( A ), C-33A ( B ), and SiHa ( C ) cells were either left untreated or pre-treated with the NOD1-stimulatory ligand Tri-DAP, the NOD2-stimulatory ligand MDP, or both Tri-DAP and MDP. After 24 hours, cells were infected with C. trachomatis , and the development of infectious EBs was assessed at the indicated time points (30, 48, and 72 hpi). Lines delineate the mean of three separate biological replicates with each replicate displayed as a colored dot. Significance was assessed via one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons. **; P < 0.01, *; P < 0.05, ns; not significant.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Infection